Improvments of the table layout

Question

We've made severals observations and proposals on the layout on the table with Barbatronic and grouped them in the following document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zeZj58cJ8As5QQC-a8mhKNVE_R9E1DVWzb1nFWNiZvo/edit?usp=sharing

This involve a number of modicfications that frees up the table, remove conflictual situations, helps readabilty and benefit to all categories of teams/contests.

(limitations of the FAQ editor prevented us from writing directly the document here)

Comments

Proposal 4: Seems logical when reducing the number of elements, but not if it's kept as is. I would prefer to exchange the small bottom building site with the opponent (the middle one) starting position.

---

Proposal 5: I don't really know, I don't have an opinion about it.

---

Proposal 6: even less elements...

---

Proposal 7: Love it, the reshape of the pit will prevent too many PAMIs pogo while keeping the previously used ArUcO positions

---

All proposals are great, except for 2 and 3, as they would significantly impact the strategy and design of robots. It seems that the 'four-can' concept is intended to change the previous year's robot design and strategies.

Answer 1

Pris en compte pour la version finale de la table

Comments

Bonjour à tous,

Changer le nombre de boites de conserve et le nombre de planches risque de compliquer la tâches de beaucoup d'équipes junior.

La première rencontre régionale a lieu le 1er février.

Ca laisse au max une dizaine de séances à venir. S'il faut  changer d'idées pour les stratégies et les actionneurs ça va vraiment devenir compliqué dans le temps imparti.

Mais évidemment ce n'est que mon avis.

Seb